Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re: Warren C. Robinson, 93-8043 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-8043 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 15, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 9 F.3d 1544 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In Re: Warren C. ROBINSON, Petitioner. No. 93-8043. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: August 5, 1993. Decided: November 15, 1993. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Warren C. Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. PET
More

9 F.3d 1544

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In Re: Warren C. ROBINSON, Petitioner.

No. 93-8043.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 5, 1993.
Decided: November 15, 1993.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Warren C. Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Warren C. Robinson has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court to compel the district court to expedite its consideration of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988). Because we find no delay in the court's consideration of his petition, we deny Robinson's petition for writ of mandamus.*

2

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Courts are extremely reluctant to grant a writ of mandamus. In re Ford Motor Co., 751 F.2d 274, 275 (8th Cir. 1984). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Our review of the district court record discloses that there has been no unnecessary delay in considering Robinson's habeas corpus petition. We therefore deny his petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

*

We grant Robinson leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer