Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Donald Lamont Postell, 92-6982 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6982 Visitors: 39
Filed: May 06, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 404 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Donald Lamont POSTELL, Defendant Appellant. No. 92-6982. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued March 30, 1993. Decided May 6, 1994. Appeal from the United States Dis
More

23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Donald Lamont POSTELL, Defendant Appellant.

No. 92-6982.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1993.
Decided May 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-88-136-C-CR, CA-92-58-3-P)

Donald Lamont Postell, Appellant Pro Se.

Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC. for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Donald Lamont Postell appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Postell, No. CR-88-136-C-CR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisioal process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer