Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fred Allen Cooper v. David K. Smith, Warden, 93-6747 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6747 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 02, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 35 F.3d 555 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Fred Allen COOPER, Petitioner Appellant, v. David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent Appellee. No. 93-6747. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 19, 1994. Decided Sept. 2, 1994. Appeal from the United States Dis
More

35 F.3d 555

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Fred Allen COOPER, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6747.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Sept. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-213-3).

Fred Allen Cooper, appellant Pro Se.

Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Cooper v. Smith, No. CA-92-213-3 (E.D. Va. July 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer