Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yahya Abdullah Sabir v. Bishop L. Robinson, Elmanus Herndon James N. Rollins, Bernard Smith, Lieutenant Johnson, Housing Unit, 93-6799 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6799 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 18, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 14 F.3d 596 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Yahya Abdullah SABIR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Bishop L. ROBINSON, Elmanus Herndon; James N. Rollins, Bernard Smith, Lieutenant Johnson, Housing Unit, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-6799. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
More

14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Yahya Abdullah SABIR, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Bishop L. ROBINSON, Elmanus Herndon; James N. Rollins,
Bernard Smith, Lieutenant Johnson, Housing Unit,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6799.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 1993.
Decided Jan. 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smith, District Judge. (CA-93-1112-S).

Yahya Abdullah Sabir, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sabir v. Robinson, No. CA-93-1112-S (D. Md July 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer