Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Yul Carter, 93-6964 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6964 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 29, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 19 F.3d 1430 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Yul CARTER, Defendant Appellant. No. 93-6964. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 17, 1994. Decided: March 29, 1994. Appeal from the United States Distr
More

19 F.3d 1430

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Yul CARTER, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6964.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 17, 1994.
Decided: March 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-41-2).

Yul Carter, appellant pro se.

Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Carter, No. CR-90-41-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer