Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Leon Staley, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 93-6987 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6987 Visitors: 45
Filed: May 06, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 403 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Leon STALEY, Jr., Petitioner Appellant, v. STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents Appellees. No. 93-6987. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 21, 1994. Deci
More

23 F.3d 403
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leon STALEY, Jr., Petitioner Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-6987.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-3554-8AJ-3)

Leon Staley, Jr., appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Staley v. South Carolina, No. CA-92-3554-8AJ-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer