Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert Darnell Roberts v. Deputy Kluczynski Sheriff Kennedy Cecil County Detention Center Chief Lough Jeffrey Clewer, Director, 93-6994 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6994 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 13, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 16 F.3d 411 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Darnell ROBERTS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Deputy KLUCZYNSKI; Sheriff Kennedy; Cecil County Detention Center; Chief Lough; Jeffrey Clewer, Director, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-6994. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Cir
More

16 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Darnell ROBERTS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Deputy KLUCZYNSKI; Sheriff Kennedy; Cecil County Detention
Center; Chief Lough; Jeffrey Clewer, Director,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6994.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided: Jan. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-147-S)

Robert Darnell Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

H. Norman Wilson, Jr., Elkton, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Allen, Johnson, Alexander & Karp, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberts v. Kluczynski, No. CA-93-147-S (D. Md. Sept. 8, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer