Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Freddie Lee Wynn v. Doctor Hook Ms. Hanes, 93-7088 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7088 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 18, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 14 F.3d 599 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Freddie Lee WYNN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Doctor HOOK; Ms. Hanes, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-7088. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided Jan. 18, 1994. Appeal from the United States Dist
More

14 F.3d 599
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Freddie Lee WYNN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Doctor HOOK; Ms. Hanes, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-472-2)

Freddie Lee Wynn, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer