Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Willie L. Jones v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. R. Handratty, Correctional Officer, Company II John Doe, Officer, Company II, 93-7289 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7289 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 25, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 39 F.3d 1177 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Willie L. JONES, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; R. Handratty, Correctional Officer, Company II; John Doe, Officer, Company II, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-7289. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Sub
More

39 F.3d 1177

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Willie L. JONES, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; R. Handratty, Correctional Officer,
Company II; John Doe, Officer, Company II,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7289.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 17, 1994
Decided Oct. 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2863-HAR)

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Willie L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Lanham, No. CA-93-2863-HAR (D. Md. Oct. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer