Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Donald Robert Morabito v. United States Parole Commission, 93-7314 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7314 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 28, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 27 F.3d 563 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Donald Robert MORABITO, Petitioner Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent Appellee. No. 93-7314. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May 3, 1994. Decided June 28, 1994. Appeal from the Unite
More

27 F.3d 563

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Donald Robert MORABITO, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-7314.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 3, 1994.
Decided June 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-92-1187-AM)

Donald Robert Morabito, appellant pro se.

Richard Parker, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morabito v. U.S. Parole Commission, No. CA-92-1187-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer