Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Henry Donald Coleman, Jr., A/K/A Rope, 93-7324 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7324 Visitors: 18
Filed: May 10, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 403 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Donald COLEMAN, Jr., a/k/a Rope, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-7324. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 21, 1994. Decided May 10, 1994. Appeal from t
More

23 F.3d 403
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Henry Donald COLEMAN, Jr., a/k/a Rope, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-7324.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-86, CA-93-691-5-F)

Henry Donald Coleman, pro se.

John Eric Evenson, II, Asst. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Coleman, No. CR-92-86; CA-93-691-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer