Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Charles William Levy v. United States Postal Service Shoshana M. Grove, Postmaster, 94-2345 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-2345 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 05, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 42 F.3d 1386 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charles William LEVY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; Shoshana M. Grove, Postmaster, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-2345. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted November 17, 1994. Decided Dec
More

42 F.3d 1386

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles William LEVY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; Shoshana M. Grove,
Postmaster, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-2345.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted November 17, 1994.
Decided December 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-762)

Charles William Levy, appellant pro se. Peter J. Coniglio, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1

Charles W. Levy appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action filed against the United States Postal Service and the Postmaster of Annandale, Virginia, in which he alleged that the Defendants prevented him from soliciting petition signatures for his congressional campaign. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion reveals that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Levy v. United States Postal Service, No. CA-94-762 (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer