Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Melvin Eugene Robinson v. Correctional Officer Gibson, 94-6060 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6060 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 23, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 19 F.3d 1430 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GIBSON, Defendant Appellee. No. 94-6060. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 15, 1994. Decided: March 23, 1994. Appeal from the Unit
More

19 F.3d 1430

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GIBSON, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6060.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1994.
Decided: March 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh; Terrance W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-745-CRT-BO)

Melvin Eugene Robinson, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Gibson, No. CA-93-745-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer