Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Nathaniel Walloe, Jr., 94-6146 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6146 Visitors: 41
Filed: Sep. 23, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 36 F.3d 1095 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Nathaniel WALLOE, Jr., Defendant Appellant. No. 94-6146. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 6, 1994 Decided: September 23, 1994. Appeal from the Un
More

36 F.3d 1095

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Nathaniel WALLOE, Jr., Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6146.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 6, 1994
Decided: September 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-65-N, CA-93-866-2)

Nathaniel Walloe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Walloe, Nos. CR-92-65-N; CA-93-866-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer