Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, And, 94-6170 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6170 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 07, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 19 F.3d 1431 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Sewall B. SMITH, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, Defendant and Appellee. No. 94-6170. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 17, 1994. Decided Apr
More

19 F.3d 1431

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment
Center, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 94-6170.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 7, 1994.

Ronald A. Wilson, appellant pro se.

Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Smith, No. CA-93-1839-L (D. Md. Jan. 28, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that the court's denial of Wilson's motion for a temporary restraining order is not appealable. Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir.1976)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer