Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carlos Maurice Williams v. Joseph Harper, Sheriff, 94-6232 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6232 Visitors: 18
Filed: May 23, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 404 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Carlos Maurice WILLIAMS, Petitioner Appellant, v. Joseph HARPER, Sheriff, Respondent Appellee. No. 94-6232. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 21, 1994. Decided: May 23, 1994. Appeal from the United St
More

23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Carlos Maurice WILLIAMS, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Joseph HARPER, Sheriff, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-82).

Carlos Maurice Williams, appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Harper, No. CA-94-82 (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer