Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bobby Hubert v. Attorney General of North Carolina, 94-6365 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6365 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 08, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 32 F.3d 562 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Bobby HUBERT, Petitioner Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL of NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent Appellee. No. 94-6365. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 19, 1994 Decided: August 8, 1994. Appeal from the United S
More

32 F.3d 562

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bobby HUBERT, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL of NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6365.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: August 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-88-408-C-C-MU)

Bobby Hubert, Appellant Pro Se.

Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hubert v. Attorney Gen. of North Carolina, No. CA-88-408-C-C-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer