Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wilbert Harrison Boyd, Jr. v. James L. Waddle, Captain Charles Johnson, Sergeant, 94-6482 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6482 Visitors: 42
Filed: Jul. 25, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 128 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wilbert Harrison BOYD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. James L. WADDLE, Captain; Charles Johnson, Sergeant, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6482. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 23, 1994 Decided: July 25,
More

30 F.3d 128

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wilbert Harrison BOYD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
James L. WADDLE, Captain; Charles Johnson, Sergeant,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6482.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 1994
Decided: July 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-834-R)

Wilbert Harrison Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Mary Christine Maggard, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Waddle, No. CA-93-834-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer