Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Marion Head, Jr. v. Robert Harris Robert W. Wolf, 94-6528 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6528 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jul. 26, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph Marion HEAD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. Robert HARRIS; Robert W. Wolf, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6528. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 23, 1994. Decided July 26, 1994. Appeal from the Unit
More

30 F.3d 129

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph Marion HEAD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Robert HARRIS; Robert W. Wolf, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6528.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 1994.
Decided July 26, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-94-234)

Joseph Marion Head, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Head v. Harris, No. CA-94-234 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer