Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rita Evans Williams v. Pasquotank County Department of Social Services, 94-6565 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6565 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 27, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rita Evans WILLIAMS, Petitioner Appellant, v. PASQUOTANK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent Appellee. No. 94-6565. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 23, 1994. Decided July 27, 1994. Appeal
More

30 F.3d 132

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rita Evans WILLIAMS, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
PASQUOTANK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6565.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 1994.
Decided July 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-272-5-F).

Rita Evans Williams, appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Pasquotank County Dep't of Social Servs., No. CA-94-272-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer