Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

94-6621 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6621 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 13, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 38 F.3d 1213 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Warren H. COX, Plaintiff Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Department of Social Services; Edward Murray, Director; Ray D. Pethtel, Director, Virginia Department of Transportation; Larry Jones, District
More

38 F.3d 1213
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Warren H. COX, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DIVISION of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Department
of Social Services; Edward Murray, Director; Ray D.
Pethtel, Director, Virginia Department of Transportation;
Larry Jones, District Attorney, Defendants Appellees,
and
Virginia Department of Social Services; Brunswick County,
Virginia; Virginia Department of Corrections;
Director, Virginia Department of
Highways; Michael Evans,
Director, Defendants.

No. 94-6621.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-498-R)

Warren H. Cox, appellant pro se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Todd Edward LePage, Robert B. Cousins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; Archer Lafayette Yeatts, III, MALONEY, YEATTS & BARR, P.C., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Director, Va. Dep't of Social Services, No. CA-93-498-R (E.D. Va. May 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer