Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

James D. Haburn, Sr. v. Earnest Sanchez Burgaw Police Department Pender County District Attorney Kilroy, Higgins & Heckant, 94-6699 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6699 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 18, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 35 F.3d 556 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James D. HABURN, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. Earnest SANCHEZ; Burgaw Police Department; Pender County District Attorney; Kilroy, Higgins & Heckant, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6699. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
More

35 F.3d 556

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James D. HABURN, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Earnest SANCHEZ; Burgaw Police Department; Pender County
District Attorney; Kilroy, Higgins & Heckant,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6699.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided August 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-93-312-CRT-BO).

James D. Haburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as moot his motion to amend the complaint and petition for writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haburn v. Sanchez, No. CA-93-312-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. June 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer