Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

American Security Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association v. Robert H. Keeler, and Saratoga Development Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, 93-2160 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-2160 Visitors: 37
Filed: Jul. 06, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 820 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. AMERICAN SECURITY BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert H. KEELER, Defendant-Appellant, and SARATOGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, Defendant. No. 93-2160. United States Co
More

60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

AMERICAN SECURITY BANK, N.A., a National Banking
Association, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Robert H. KEELER, Defendant--Appellant,
and SARATOGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Maryland
Corporation, Defendant.

No. 93-2160.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1995.
Decided July 6, 1995.

Robert H. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. M. Sean Laane, ARNOLD & PORTER, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert Keeler appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to American Security Bank, N.A., in its action seeking to recover from Keeler amounts owed under two loan guarantees. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. American Security Bank v. Keeler, No. CA-92-511 (D. Md. Aug. 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer