Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

94-2128 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-2128 Visitors: 48
Filed: Mar. 02, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 48 F.3d 1217 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James Gary SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and ATTORNEY GENERAL, of the United States Department of Justice; DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants. No. 94-2128. United S
More

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Gary SMITH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant--Appellee,
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL, of the United States Department of
Justice; DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
PRISONS, Defendants.

No. 94-2128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995
Decided: March 2, 1995

James Gary Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Roann Nichols, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

James Gary Smith appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Federal Torts Claim Act action claiming medical malpractice while he was incarcerated in a federal prison due to his untimely filing of a motion for administrative reconsideration.

2

Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. United States, No. CA-94-482-S (D. Md. July 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer