Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re: Dorothy P. Litzenberg, 94-2375 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-2375 Visitors: 34
Filed: Mar. 29, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 267 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In RE: Dorothy P. LITZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant. No. 94-2375. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 15, 1995. Decided March 29, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Mary
More

51 F.3d 267

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In RE: Dorothy P. LITZENBERG, Plaintiff--Appellant.

No. 94-2375.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided March 29, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (MISC-94-67)

Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, GDep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

In light of this disposition, we deny Appellant's motions to amend the district court's order, to compel removal, for appointment of counsel, to file a complete or corrected record, for emergency relief, and for an emergency hearing

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer