Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kevin S. Brown v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, 94-2604 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-2604 Visitors: 59
Filed: Mar. 02, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 48 F.3d 1215 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kevin S. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-2604. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 2, 1995. Kevin S. Brown, Appellant
More

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin S. BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-2604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 2, 1995.

Kevin S. Brown, Appellant pro se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr., Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in his employment and benefit discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Brown v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., No. CA-94-2132-Y (D.Md. Dec. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is denied for that reason

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer