Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bobby Ray Brown v. Talmadge Barnett, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Center, 94-6491 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6491 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 22, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 50 F.3d 5 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Bobby Ray BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Talmadge BARNETT, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-6491. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1995. Decided Feb. 22, 19
More

50 F.3d 5

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bobby Ray BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Talmadge BARNETT, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional
Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-6491.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 1995.
Decided Feb. 22, 1995.

Kenneth Stanley Broun, University of North Carolina School of Law, Chapel Hill, NC, for appellant. Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Barnett, No. CA-92-679-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer