Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

94-6614 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6614 Visitors: 34
Filed: Mar. 03, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 48 F.3d 1216 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James FURTICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GORDON, Director, Orangeburg County Jail; Blake Taylor, Jail and Prison Inspector, SCDC; John Doe, Chairman of Orangeburg County Council; Gary A. Smoak, Orangeburg County Administrator;
More

48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James FURTICK, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
James GORDON, Director, Orangeburg County Jail; Blake
Taylor, Jail and Prison Inspector, SCDC; John Doe, Chairman
of Orangeburg County Council; Gary A. Smoak, Orangeburg
County Administrator; Guard Dozier, Orangeburg County Jail;
Guard Floyd, Orangeburg County Jail; Guard Williams,
Orangeburg County Jail; Guard Heckle, Food Service
Supervisor at Orangeburg County Jail; Guard Snell,
Orangeburg County Jail; Guard Johnson, Chief Correctional
Supervisor at the Orangeburg County Jail, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-6614.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995
Decided: March 3, 1995

James Furtick, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Anne Macon Flynn, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, GRIER & HOWSER, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Furtick v. Gordon, No. CA-93-1503-5-OBC (D.S.C. May 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer