Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert E. Hyman v. Andrew Winston, Sheriff Iva R. Purdy, Clerk, Circuit Court Edward W. Murray, Director of the Department of Corrections, 94-6887 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6887 Visitors: 34
Filed: Mar. 27, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 266 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert E. HYMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew WINSTON, Sheriff; Iva R. Purdy, Clerk, Circuit Court; Edward W. Murray, Director of the Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-6887. United States Court of Appeals, F
More

51 F.3d 266

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert E. HYMAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Andrew WINSTON, Sheriff; Iva R. Purdy, Clerk, Circuit
Court; Edward W. Murray, Director of the
Department of Corrections, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-6887.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 1995.
Decided March 27, 1995.

Robert E. Hyman, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Our review of the record discloses no abuse of discretion by the district court. See Denton v. Hernandez, 60 U.S.L.W. 4346, 4348 (U.S.1992); Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 73-74 (4th Cir.1994). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hyman v. Winston, No. CA-94-715-N (E.D. Va. July 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer