Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Clarence Alfred Lindsey, A/K/A Clarence Lindsay, A/K/A Cal, 94-6941 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6941 Visitors: 33
Filed: Feb. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 47 F.3d 1166 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence Alfred LINDSEY, a/k/a Clarence Lindsay, a/k/a Cal, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-6941. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 19, 1995. Decided Feb. 1
More

47 F.3d 1166

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Clarence Alfred LINDSEY, a/k/a Clarence Lindsay, a/k/a Cal,
Defendant--Appellant.

No. 94-6941.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 14, 1995.

Clarence Alfred Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lindsey, Nos. CR-91-116-N; CA-94-570 (E.D. Va. June 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer