Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Welmont Haden Sartin, Jr., and Anthony Thomas Torcasio v. G.P. Dodson Virginia Smith Nurse Rose Officer McCroskey Sergeant Hess Mr. Davis, 94-6983 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6983 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 31, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 268 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Welmont Haden SARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, and Anthony Thomas TORCASIO, Plaintiff, v. G.P. Dodson; Virginia Smith; Nurse Rose; Officer McCroskey; Sergeant Hess; Mr. Davis, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-6983. United States Court
More

51 F.3d 268

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Welmont Haden SARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Anthony Thomas TORCASIO, Plaintiff,
v.
G.P. Dodson; Virginia Smith; Nurse Rose; Officer
McCroskey; Sergeant Hess; Mr. Davis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6983.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: March 31, 1995.

Welmont Haden Sartin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sartin v. Dodson, No. CA-93-653-R (W.D.Va. July 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED..

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer