Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

94-6989 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6989 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 31, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 270 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Sylvester Emerson WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMPLIANCE OFFICE AT HEADQUARTERS; Laurie Bessinger, Warden, Kirkland Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-6989. United
More

51 F.3d 270

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Sylvester Emerson WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMPLIANCE OFFICE
AT HEADQUARTERS; Laurie Bessinger, Warden,
Kirkland Correctional Institution,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6989.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: March 31, 1995.

Sylvester Emerson Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bunyan Lewis, Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, Lewis, Reeves & Stone, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-93-1986-3-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED..

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer