Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Willie M. Hardy, Jr. v. Virginia Parole Board Clarence L. Jackson, Former Chairman, 94-7189 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7189 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 48 F.3d 1216 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Willie M. HARDY, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; Clarence L. Jackson, Former Chairman, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-7189. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: February 16, 1995 Decided:
More

48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie M. HARDY, JR., Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; Clarence L. Jackson, Former
Chairman, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7189.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995
Decided: March 14, 1995

Willie M. Hardy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Mary Elizabeth Shea, Offfice of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Hardy v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-94-916-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer