Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Terry Lynn Fields v. Lonnie M. Saunders, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center, 94-7243 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7243 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 03, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 266 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Terry Lynn FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-7243. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 15, 1995. Decided: April 3, 199
More

51 F.3d 266

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Terry Lynn FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center,
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7243.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 3, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-816-AM)

Terry Lynn Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fields v. Saunders, No. CA-94-816-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer