Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Walter Woltz v. Ava I. Gift, Office Supervisor Iii, Hagerstown Regional Commitment Office, 94-7278 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7278 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 03, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 270 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Walter WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ava I. GIFT, Office Supervisor III, Hagerstown Regional Commitment Office, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-7278. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: March 15, 1995. Dec
More

51 F.3d 270

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Walter WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ava I. GIFT, Office Supervisor III, Hagerstown Regional
Commitment Office, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-7278.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 3, 1995.

Robert Walter Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woltz v. Gift, No. CA-94-2544-B (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1994). See also Heck v. Humphrey, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594 (U.S.1994) (Sec. 1983 action calling into question the validity of a conviction is not cognizable unless the conviction has been overturned). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer