Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

John M. Miller v. S.R. Witkowski, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 94-7371 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7371 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 04, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 267 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John M. MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S.R. WITKOWSKI, Warden; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-7371. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Mar
More

51 F.3d 267

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John M. MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
S.R. WITKOWSKI, Warden; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General
of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 94-7371.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995
Decided: April 4, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-244-3-19AK)

John M. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Witkowski, No. CA-94-244-3-19AK (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer