Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-1297 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1297 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 15, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 64 F.3d 656 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William Lebron CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, and The ROYAL ORDER OF SACRED KLANSMEN; The Royal Order of the Sacred Knights; The Justice Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF COL
More

64 F.3d 656

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Lebron CHURCH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
The ROYAL ORDER OF SACRED KLANSMEN; The Royal Order of the
Sacred Knights; The Justice Knights of the Ku
Klux Klan, Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE,
INCORPORATED; Benjamin Chavis; Mayor, City Hall,
Cumberland, Maryland; State of
Maryland, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-1297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 15, 1995.

William Lebron Church, Appellant Pro Se. Evelyn Omega Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Church v. NAACP, Inc., No. CA-94-3351-MJG (D.Md. Jan. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer