Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jeanne M. Banazek v. State of Virginia Benjamin F. Zambrana, M.D., 95-1398 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1398 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 10, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 62 F.3d 1414 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jeanne M. BANAZEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Virginia; Benjamin F. Zambrana, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-1398. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1995. Submitted: July 25, 1995 Decided: Aug
More

62 F.3d 1414

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jeanne M. BANAZEK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Virginia; Benjamin F. Zambrana, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1398.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 10, 1995.
Submitted: July 25, 1995
Decided: August 10, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

Jeanne M. Banazek, Appellant Pro Se.

Barbara J. Gaden, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Sheridan Brennan, Wright, Robinson, Mccammon, Osthimer & Tatum, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Banazek v. Virginia, No. CA-94-734 (E.D.Va. Feb. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer