Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Marcus Johnson, A/K/A Mack P. Carter v. Sussex County Jail E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff M. Knowles, Lieutenant John Zimmerman, Sergeant, 95-6127 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6127 Visitors: 35
Filed: Apr. 12, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 52 F.3d 321 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Marcus JOHNSON, a/k/a Mack P. Carter, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUSSEX COUNTY JAIL; E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff; M. Knowles, Lieutenant; John Zimmerman, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6127. United States Court of Appeals, Fou
More

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Marcus JOHNSON, a/k/a Mack P. Carter, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
SUSSEX COUNTY JAIL; E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff; M.
Knowles, Lieutenant; John Zimmerman, Sergeant,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6127.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 12, 1995.

Marcus Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Archer Lafayette Yeatts, III, Maloney, Yeatts & Barr, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Sussex County Jail, No. CA-94-50 (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer