Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steven M. Johnson v. Captain Burkehart, Co v. Lieutenant Pickett, Co IV B.W. Thuss, Co II Officer Dumweilter, Co II, 95-6392 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6392 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 27, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 822 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPTAIN BURKEHART, CO V; Lieutenant Pickett, CO IV; B.W. Thuss, CO II; Officer Dumweilter, CO II, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6392. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Su
More

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN BURKEHART, CO V; Lieutenant Pickett, CO IV; B.W.
Thuss, CO II; Officer Dumweilter, CO II,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6392.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995
Decided June 27, 1995

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court.* Johnson v. Burkehart, No. CA-94-2026-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

To the extent that Johnson claimed a violation of Fourth Amendment rights due to searches conducted by prison officials, this claim lacks merit because inmates have no Fourth Amendment right to be free from searches. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 522-30 (1984)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer