Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-6478 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6478 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 10, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 62 F.3d 1415 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James A. TALBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard A. HARPOOTLIAN, Solicitor of the Fifth Judicial Circuit; Jerry L. Horton, Sheriff of Kershaw County, Defendants-Appellees, and TRAVIS, Attorney General; State of South Carolin
More

62 F.3d 1415

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James A. TALBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. HARPOOTLIAN, Solicitor of the Fifth Judicial
Circuit; Jerry L. Horton, Sheriff of Kershaw
County, Defendants-Appellees,
and
TRAVIS, Attorney General; State of South Carolina, Defendants.

No. 95-6478.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 10, 1995.

James A. Talbert, appellant pro se. David Leon Morrison, Ellis, Lawhorne, Davidson, Sims, Morrison & Sojourner, P.A., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for leave to amend his complaint and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Talbert v. Harpootlian, No. CA-92-2772-3-17BC (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer