Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-6598 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6598 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jul. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 60 F.3d 822 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John A. HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DORCHESTER COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE; Dorchester County Courthouse; Summerville Police Department; Melissa Dyches; Norbert E. Cummings, Jr.; Unknown Informant, and/or other participants,
More

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John A. HAYNES, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
DORCHESTER COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE; Dorchester County
Courthouse; Summerville Police Department; Melissa Dyches;
Norbert E. Cummings, Jr.; Unknown Informant, and/or other
participants, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6598.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

John A. Haynes, appellant pro se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC; Sandra J. Senn, Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office, No. CA-94-598-3-6-BC (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer