Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-6599 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6599 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 17, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 64 F.3d 655 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rodney BLACK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bill DAVIS, Warden, for the Department of Corrections; State of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-6599. Uni
More

64 F.3d 655

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rodney BLACK, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Bill DAVIS, Warden, for the Department of Corrections;
State of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock,
Attorney General of the State of South
Carolina, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-6599.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1995.

Rodney Black, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report recommending denial of Appellant's motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer