Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Frank M. Gaster v. Lorraine T. Fowler, Director, Rim Thomas L. Barrett, Chief, Rim Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Incorporated, 95-6796 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6796 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 21, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 64 F.3d 656 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frank M. GASTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine T. FOWLER, Director, Rim; Thomas L. Barrett, Chief, Rim; Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6796. United States Court of Ap
More

64 F.3d 656

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank M. GASTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lorraine T. FOWLER, Director, Rim; Thomas L. Barrett,
Chief, Rim; Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph
Company, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6796.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 21, 1995.

Frank M. Gaster, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gaster v. Fowler, No. CA-95-338-2-20-AJ (D.S.C. May 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer