Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

95-7087 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7087 Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 12, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 72 F.3d 127 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Willie Morris McBride, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BRASWELL, Officer; Timothy S. Evans, Investigator; R.L. Chupik, Investigator; Unknown Jones, Deputy; S.I. Squyres, Investigator; David K. Mapp, Jr., Sheriff, Defendants-Ap
More

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie Morris McBride, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William BRASWELL, Officer; Timothy S. Evans, Investigator;
R.L. Chupik, Investigator; Unknown Jones, Deputy;
S.I. Squyres, Investigator; David K.
Mapp, Jr., Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7087.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-136)

Willie Morris McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer