Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael A. Campbell v. Diane Poindexter, Parole Board Member Sue Richmond, Parole Officer, 95-7096 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-7096 Visitors: 137
Filed: Nov. 16, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 70 F.3d 111 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael A. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Diane POINDEXTER, Parole Board Member; Sue Richmond, Parole Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-7096. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 31, 1995. Deci
More

70 F.3d 111

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael A. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Diane POINDEXTER, Parole Board Member; Sue Richmond, Parole
Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7096.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1995.
Decided Nov. 16, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-94-148-2)

Michael A. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Poindexter, No. CA-94-148-2 (N.D.W.Va. May 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer