Filed: Aug. 02, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 94-1724 FRANK J. BORSODY; KATHRYN A. BORSODY, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 7690-90, 28454-91) Submitted: March 31, 1995 Decided: August 2, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank J. Borsody, Kathryn A. Borsody, App
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 94-1724 FRANK J. BORSODY; KATHRYN A. BORSODY, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 7690-90, 28454-91) Submitted: March 31, 1995 Decided: August 2, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank J. Borsody, Kathryn A. Borsody, Appe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-1724
FRANK J. BORSODY; KATHRYN A. BORSODY,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 7690-90,
28454-91)
Submitted: March 31, 1995 Decided: August 2, 1996
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank J. Borsody, Kathryn A. Borsody, Appellants Pro Se. David I.
Pincus, Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Annette Marie Wietecha,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Frank Borsody and his wife, Kathryn Borsody, appeal from
the tax court's decision finding them liable for additional taxes
and penalties with respect to their 1987, 1988, and 1989 income tax
liabilities. Our review of the record and the tax court's opinion
reveals that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the tax court. Borsody v. Commissioner, Tax Ct.
Nos. 7690-90, 28454-91 (U.S. Tax Court, Dec. 2, 1993; Mar. 7,
1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
In light of this disposition, the Appellants' motion to stay
is denied.
2