Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sloan v. Murray, 94-7083 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7083 Visitors: 32
Filed: Mar. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 94-7083 MICHAEL W. SLOAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDWARD W. MURRAY; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; R. F. WILSON; SARA THOMAS; LOU ANN WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-314-R) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 94-7083 MICHAEL W. SLOAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDWARD W. MURRAY; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; R. F. WILSON; SARA THOMAS; LOU ANN WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-314-R) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael W. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sloan v. Murray, No. CA-93-314-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1993 & Aug. 31, 1994). We further deny Appellant's "Motion for Judgment." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer