UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 94-7317 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MORTON M. LAPIDES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-87-123, CA-92-45-N) Submitted: August 6, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel I. Prywes, PEPPER, HAMILTON & SCHEETZ, Washington, D.C.; Dale Andrew Cooter, Donna Simonek Mangold, COOTER, MANGOLD, TOMPERT, CHAPMAN & COOTER, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Andrea Limmer, John J. Powers, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217, or in the alternative, for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1988). Appellant also appeals the denial of his motions for judicial recusal and for discovery. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lapides, Nos. CR-87-123; CA-92-45-N (E.D. Va. May 22, 1992; July 20, 1993; Oct. 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2