Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kingsbury Miller v. Breit, Dresher & Bre, 95-1009 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-1009 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1009 KAREN M. KINGSBURY MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BREIT, DRESCHER & BREIT, P.C., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1052) Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen M. Ki
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-1009 KAREN M. KINGSBURY MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BREIT, DRESCHER & BREIT, P.C., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1052) Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen M. Kingsbury Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Albert Giordano, SHUTTLEWORTH, RULOFF, GIORDANO & KAHLE, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying her action seeking monetary penalties under 29 U.S.C.A. ยง 1132(c)(1) (West Supp. 1995) for failure to timely notify her of her rights to continue her health insurance benefits, and denying her motion for costs and attorney's fees. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kingsbury Miller v. Breit, Dresher & Breit, P.C., No. CA-93-1052 (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 1994 & Jan. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer